Spiritual Health Learning Community Center
Exploring Life's Horizons
                                            
Thinking About Islam
The Nature of Idols - Continued - Part 6

You go on to say that the Temple Mount

“has been under the care of the Waqf, or Islamic endowment. The Waqf is a trust for Muslims now and in the future, and one would be hard pressed to find an honest scholar that would accept the idea of giving up anything from an endowment to assist in the disobedience to Allah.”

Well, I guess if one is to use your measuring rod, I must neither be a scholar nor honest, because I do not see anything wrong with permitting the Jewish people to regain control of the Temple Mount in exchange for giving back other lands to the Palestinians and restoring their sovereignty as a people. In fact, I might even go one step further.

You say that the Temple Mount is a trust which is being kept for Muslims -- both now and in the future. You go on to say that “in fact, in Islamic law, it is forbidden to give lands or monies to help any other religion based on that principle” – the principle here, according to you, being one of rewarding a people for their alleged disobedience.

However, if the Jews were to return stolen land and sovereignty to the Palestinians they would not be guilty of disobedience but, instead, they would be acting in accordance with the requirements of Divine justice. Moreover, Judaism – despite its name – is, in its essence not really a Deen that is other than Islam, whatever the differences of exoteric particulars may be – so nothing would be given to people who were not of the Book and who were not part of the Prophetic tradition.

In addition, I believe a case can be made for the fact that you cannot hold in trust that which did not belong to you originally. For example, if I illicitly take property from an orphan, and, then, declare a trust consisting of the money and property I have usurped from the orphans, this would be impermissible according to principles of jurisprudence which are rooted in the Qur'an.

Originally, Muslims did not own the Temple Mount. Initially it belonged to the Jewish people, and, then, was taken from them and, subsequently, transferred to a succession of rulers who claimed the land as their own.

If the Palestinians – along with much, if not all, of the Muslim world – believe that the requirement of justice demands that lands and sovereignty be restored to the Palestinians, then, surely, it follows that land which was illicitly taken from the Jewish people, and, then transferred from ruler to ruler down through the ages, should also be restored to the original owners of that land. One cannot be committed to the first application of justice without also being committed to the second application of justice.

You next claim:

“Muslims cannot look at it through relativism as you have – i.e. the Temple is important to Jews and the Dome of the Rock is not too important to Muslims – because every Muslim must believe in the Word of Allah in the Koran, and in this case that Judaism has been abrogated by Allah Himself. For myself and many, many Muslims, your proposal is untenable.”

I do not believe I am looking at the Temple Mount issue in a relativistic manner, nor have I said that the Temple Mount is unimportant to Muslims. And, contrary to what you assert, I propose what I do because I do believe in the Qur'an and that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the nabi and rasul of Allah.

The essence of Judaism has not been abrogated. Rather, the teachings of the Jewish Prophets and the Torah have been added to, completed, and brought to perfection through the Qur'an and the Prophetic mission of Muhammad (peace be upon him). We are talking about a transformed continuation of what had been, not a wholesale rejection of the teachings, values, beliefs, and practices of the Jewish faith.

The Torah was not abrogated but is, in fact, contained in the Qur'an. The teachings of Moses and Aaron (peace be upon them) have not been abrogated but they have been given life through the Qur'an.

Original teachings, principles, beliefs, and values have been confirmed, added to, as well as modulated in this way and that way. However, nothing of essence has been abrogated. Nowhere has Allah said in the Qur'an that I abrogate the Torah or the teachings of Moses (peace be upon him). Nowhere does Allah say that Jews must become Muslim, but, instead, that they are among the believers who if they practice the Deen of truth and do good deeds will be among those, God willing, who will have nothing to fear and will not grieve.

Allah does say, as you have pointed out and as I have previously discussed, that only Islam will be accepted as a Deen from humankind. However, you seem to be caught up in a sort of inverse nominalist trap in which if different things are labeled differently, then, somehow both of the labels can't give expression to a common underlying and essential set of truths.

You go on to ask and answer:

“Moreover, why even bother? The majority of Jews – and certainly those of the orthodox – believe that the Messiah will come and take care of the Temple business. Muslims too believe that the same Messiah will come and straighten out all the problems. This has really been the unspoken agreement that we have – wait for the Messiah. It is the voices of radicalism, from Jews and Christians, which are really enflaming the issue.”

And, of course, Muslims have nothing to do with any of the problems of the world. It is always someone else who is the troublemaker.

The issue is really quite simple. If Muslims will give back what does not belong to them, then, perhaps, the Jewish people will be encouraged to give back what does not really belong to them.

Yes, God willing, when the Messiah comes, a lot of problems may be sorted out. However, until that time arrives, we all have moral responsibilities and duties of care to observe.

One can, of course, adopt a point of view which says: let the Messiah sort things out, but in the meantime let us all make one another's life hell and be as mean, hateful, destructive, and malignant as we can be. Or, perhaps, one can try to live, now, in accordance with what Islam actually demands of us all and, with God's help, take a few of the burdens from the shoulders of the Messiah before he arrives.

Next, you state:

“We obviously live in a world where we need signs and symbols to help us – the Koran is the clearest proof of this. The Dome of the Rock has its sign and secrets to help you to draw closer to Allah, if only you know how to read them.”

It has been said that in prostration is the mi'raj of a believer. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) prostrated on the Temple Mount, and, then, came the ascension in which he left the world behind -- these are some of the secrets of the Temple Mount for those who have eyes with which to see and ears with which to hear.

The lines of poetry from Shabistari with which I ended the earlier podcast go directly to the point of some of the essential secrets of the Temple Mount, so I will give those lines again:

Dream not of lights,
Of marvels, of miracles
For your miracles are contained
In worshiping the Truth;
All else is pride, conceit,
And illusion of existence. You go on to say:

“Just as it is important to have a good and proper shaykh and good friends on the path to Allah, sacred places, whether empty deserts as the Plain of Arafat or decorated buildings as the Dome of the Rock, are also important for any spiritual journey – they are all mubarak. Visiting sacred places and saintly people can open your heart more than can sometimes a book or a dhikr. All these things – places, people, journeys, books, litanies, dhikrs, buildings – all these things open the gates of the heart to Allah if only you possess the knowledge to unlock it.”

What good are “all these things – places, people, journeys, books, litanies, dhikrs, buildings – all these things “which supposedly “open the gates of the heart to Allah”, if they cannot assist us to treat other human beings humanely and enable us to interact with them justly? The Qur'an says:

“O ye who believe! Be steadfast witnesses for Allah in equity and let not hatred of any people seduce you so that you do not deal justly (with them). Deal justly, that is nearer to your duty. Observe Your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is informed of what you do.” [Qur'an 5: 8]

Finally, at one point in your e-mail, you claim:

“So, I would argue that pawning the Dome of the Rock off for peace and land will not be a cure for your diagnosis of idolatry.”

The foregoing actually misconstrues my point. I did not say that exchanging the Dome of the Rock or Temple Mount was the cure for idolatry. I said that idolatry, on both sides, is what prevents people from doing what is right in relation to the Temple Mount and the Palestinian people … and, thus, to an extent, I end where I began in the original podcast and to which you responded via your e-mail to me.



| Return to Menu | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 |


















Copyright © 2007 Interrogative Imperative Institute. All Rights Reserved.