| Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Next | Part 6 |
| Table of Contents |
Professor
Donaldson checked her wristwatch. "My time is just about up, so I'll try to wrap this
up fairly quickly." She took another drink of water.
"Many
Muslim groups talk about the 'true Islam' and the original spirit of Islam. However, mixed
in with this talk, one also finds, quite frequently, a number of other motivational forces
hiding beneath the outward talk.
"This
scenario of wolf-like motivations attempting to benefit from being hidden by the innocence
and purity of sheep's wool is not exclusive to Muslims. It plays itself out in every
religious tradition.
"Some
individuals are powerless and desire to be powerful. Some are alienated and want to have a
sense of belonging. For each of these groups of people, Islam is not important except as a
possible means of satisfying a variety of needs that are not necessarily of a spiritual
nature.
"Some
Muslim groups want to bask in the euphoria of restoring what they believe is the lost
glory of Islam. What they don't seem to understand is that Islam can never lose any of its
glory. In reality, the glory which such people seek is the pride, arrogance and conceit of
self-glorification.
"Some
of these groups and individuals are driven by national, ethnic, tribal, racial and/or
religious hatreds. They wish to exploit Islam and hijack its moral authority to serve
their dark purposes.
"The
true Islam, the original spirit of Islam, is completely preoccupied with, and absorbed in,
qualities of love, compassion, charitableness, chivalry, justice, forgiveness, tolerance,
kindness, gratitude, gentleness, humility, self-purification, patience, harmony and
selflessness. Knowing Divinity, serving Divinity, trusting in Divinity, remembering
Divinity, cherishing Divinity and loving Divinity are the woof and warp of the true Islam.
"Consequently,
to speak of Islamic terrorism is a contradiction in terms. On the other hand, to speak of
the terrorism of someone who refers to himself or herself as Muslim is not necessarily a
contradiction in terms.
"So
called Muslims who advocate the use of force and violence in order to impose their
distorted interpretation of Islam onto others do a great violence to the spirit of Islam.
This is so for four reasons.
"First,
the use of force and violence to induce compliance from others in matters of religion is
inconsistent with one of the central precepts of Islam. More specifically, there can be no
compulsion used in bringing about the realization of the essential spiritual nature of
human beings.
"The
kind of submission that God seeks comes only through an individual's free will or unforced
offering. To intimidate, extort, or terrorize people, in order to get them to adopt a
Muslim's interpretation of things, completely violates the spiritual etiquette of Islam.
"Secondly,
with respect to those who resort to the use of force, violence or terror in order to
secure acquiescence from others on a variety of social issues, such people display a
profound lack of trust in God. Such people do not have confidence in the capacity of the
will of Divinity to effectively carry out Divine purposes independently of what people do
or don't do.
"People
who rely on violence and terror to achieve their allegedly spiritual objectives have a
very inflated opinion of themselves. They seem to assume that if they did not use violence
or terror, God would be helpless to realize Divine wishes. Such people have a pathetic and
extremely warped understanding of the ways of Divinity.
"Thirdly,
whoever employs force and violence as tools of persuasion reveals an enormous poverty of
imagination, creativity, wisdom and spiritual artistry. Submission comes through the
heart's attraction to the beauty, nobility and integrity of the example which reflects the
light of Divinity. Force and violence will never generate such attraction.
"Someone
once said: 'Violence is the last refuge of incompetence'. People who are inclined to
terror and violence as instruments of spiritual evangelism are admitting incompetence.
"In
effect, they are acknowledging they lack the personal resources of integrity,
inventiveness and a generosity of spirit that are needed to exercise spiritual competence
in finding artful, non-violent solutions to problems in the face of adversity. There is
absolutely nothing resourceful about killing other people.
"Fourthly,
and finally, anyone who uses force, violence and/or terror as part of her or his yellow-brick
road to paradise is debasing the nature of the intention which should be behind all actions of a Muslim. Everything should be done for the sake of God's satisfaction and
pleasure.
"If one
is committing acts of violence because one believes this will be one's ticket of admission
to heaven, the intention underlying one's acts is the achievement of paradise, not the
pleasure of God. God's pleasure merely becomes a means to one's own ends.
"In
addition, if a group or individual actually believes God finds either pleasure or
satisfaction in acts of terror or misguided violence, then such people have a very
distorted understanding of how to go about pleasing God. Unfortunately, such beliefs have
been very prevalent throughout history, and not just amongst Muslims."
As Professor
Donaldson concluded, Dr. Jameson stood up and went to the front of the room, near where
Rachel was standing. On behalf of the Bettinger Foundation, he expressed an appreciation
for her willingness to share her ideas with the people in attendance. He also reminded
people of the coffee and other refreshments awaiting them near the back wall. Finally, he
thanked everyone for coming to the program.
While
watching Dr. Jameson express appreciation to Professor Donaldson for sharing her ideas
with the audience, my clinical training wouldn't permit me to miss the fact that his body
language was very much out of sync with his words.
Apparently,
for whatever reason, Dr. Donaldson was the source of the irritation I had observed in
Dr. Jameson about half way through the Q and A session.
| Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Next | Part 6 |
| Table of Contents |
|