Spiritual Health Learning Community Center
Exploring Life's Horizons
 
                                            
»   Reality Menu
The Reality Without A Name
44 - Character Traits - Part Two


The author of Sufism - A Short Introduction indicates that "assuming the character traits of God" is central to the Sufi Path, but one never gets a clear sense from his book of why this is important. Undoubtedly, the righteousness, good conduct, and proper adab which is made possible through "assuming the character traits of God" is of value, both to the individual and the surrounding community, but this realm of activity is derivative and, therefore, secondary to the primary purpose underlying why Sufi shaykhs, such as ibn al-‘Arabi, give emphasis to the process of "assuming the character traits of God".

In the Qur’an, one finds the following verses: "What is there after the Real, save error?" (10:32). "What is with you comes to an end, but what is with God remains." (16:96) "I have not created human beings nor jinn except that they may worship Me." (51:-56-57) "With Him are the keys to the Unseen; none knows them but He." (6:59) "Only those who possess the kernels remember." (39:9)

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: "Whoever knows Allah curbs one’s tongue from speaking about Allah, since this kind of knowledge cannot be contained in speech." The Prophet is also reported to have said: "Only God’s Attributes are fit to praise His Essence."

Humankind, along with jinn, and, indeed, all of creation, have been given manifested being in order to worship Divinity. That worship is best which gives expression to the deepest, most intimate knowledge of God, for not only is the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) reported to have said: "Should the day come when I increase not in knowledge wherewith to draw nearer to God, then, let the dawn of that day be accursed", but, as previously indicated, a Hadith Qudsi states: "I [i.e., God] was a Hidden Treasure and desired to be known, so I brought forth creation."

For God to be worshiped purely, all sources of distortion must be removed, and this condition is realized when the Attributes of God are present to manifest the Real without interference from that which constitutes ‘error’. Moreover, that form of worship which is lasting and "remains" is what is with God, as opposed to that which is with us but "comes to an end" - and what ‘remains’ abides by means of the Divine Attributes.

Furthermore, the knowledge of God that is ineffable - and to which the aforementioned Hadith of the Prophet, concerning the curbing of one’s tongue, alluded - is rooted in the Attributes of Divinity. In addition, the ‘kernels’ of true remembrance mentioned in the Quranic ayat cited earlier, are contained in the Attributes of Divinity.

As well, the keys to the Unseen, which gives expression to the Hidden Treasure, and which none knows but God, are inherent in the Attributes of Divinity. Finally, as a Hadith given above noted, the most fitting praise - and, therefore, worship - of Allah only can take place by means of the Attributes of Divinity.

If we are to fulfill the purpose of our coming into created being - not only with respect to knowing the Hidden Treasure, but, also, by putting this knowledge into action in the form of worship that is God’s right, then, we must strive toward "assuming the character traits of God", for these encompass the essential kernels of knowledge which are given expression through a sincere, pure worship of God. The potential for realizing these Divine character traits within us is inherent in fitra - our primordial spiritual capacity, and it was to this realized potential within Adam (peace be upon him) - a realization which occurred when Allah blew of His Spirit into the essential being of Adam (peace be upon him) - that the angels and Iblis were commanded to fall prostrate.

The author of Sufism - A Short Introduction asserts that one of the primary tasks of a Sufi shaykh is "to shape the character (khuluq) of the disciple so that it conforms to the prophetic model." However, he never specifies what the nature of that model is.

There are many Hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) concerning the importance of ‘character traits’. For example, the Prophet is reported to have said: "I have been given all the Names and have been sent to perfect good character." In another tradition, the Prophet was asked which part of faith is most excellent, and he is reported to have responded: "A beautiful character." In, yet, another Hadith, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was reported to have said: "The best thing in the Scale on the Day of Judgement will be a beautiful character."

The juxtaposition of "Names" and "good character" in the first Hadith noted above is not coincidental. The perfection of "good character" - for which the Prophet was sent by God - is the ‘beautiful character’ about which the Prophet spoke in a number of traditions, such as those cited previously.

Moreover, ‘beautiful character’ is a reflection of the Divine Names that had been given to the Prophet and which were to be both the means through which the perfection of ‘good character’ to ‘beautiful character’ took place, as well as the goal of the perfection process. When ‘good character’ has been purified and polished through association with the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), it becomes a mirror capable of reflecting the beautiful Names of God.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: "Allah has 300 attributes, and the individual who acquires just one of these will inherit paradise." If the acquisition of just one Divine attribute results in paradise, then, what would be the result of acquiring, God willing, more than one?

In fact, the goal of the Sufi Path is to acquire as many of these attributes as God allows and spiritual capacity permits. For, through the acquisition of these attributes, one is opened up to witnessing - and, thereby, knowing - the Hidden Treasure, and this was the niyat of the Divine Himma or aspiration for creation.

One ‘acquires’ a character trait of God when one’s being is a proper surface for reflecting that trait. One ‘acquires’ a Divine character trait when one becomes a locus of manifestation for that trait, and, this only is possible when all that stands in the way of proper reflection or manifestation has been removed by virtue of the process of purification which was at the heart of the mission for which the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) had been sent and for which he had been given all the Names.

The author of Sufism - A Short Introduction follows up on his discussion of the importance of character traits by claiming: "This concern to bring out the soul’s innate divine qualities helps explain the great attention that Sufi teachers devote to the ‘stations’ (maqamat) of ascent on the path to God and the ‘states’ (ahwal) or psychological and spiritual transformations that travelers undergo in their attempt to pass through the stations."While, from time to time, Sufi shaykhs do speak of ‘states’ and ‘stations’, nevertheless, to maintain, as the author does in the above quote, that they give "great attention" to such topics is quite misleading, and there are a variety of reasons for this.

Before exploring some of these reasons, however, there are several qualifications which need to be pointed out in conjunction with the author’s foregoing quote. For instance, although terms such as ‘path’, ‘journey’, ‘way’, ‘ascent’, ‘traveling’, and so on, are used, on a regular basis, to describe the process which an initiated seeker undertakes in order to fulfill the purpose of life, this is not really a "path to [my emphasis] God".

Divinity is always, and everywhere, present. One does not ‘journey to’ that which already is present, and, consequently, one needs to keep in mind that this manner of talking about things is really just a figure of speech.

In truth, the spiritual or mystical journey is one of an ever-deepening awareness and realization of God’s nearness. At any given time, we may be distant from such a realization, and, therefore, it may seem as if we are traveling to some location which is removed from us in space and time, but this illusion merely gives expression to the veils which blind us to the Divine Presence.

At various junctures in the Qur’an, one finds verses like: "He is with you wherever you are." (57:4) "We are closer to him than his jugular vein." (50:16) "... and know that Allah comes between a man and his heart." (8:24) "Wheresoever you turn, there is the Face of God." (2:115)

All of the foregoing Quranic verses are quite clear that God is ‘here’, not ‘there’. Even transcendent attributes of Divinity are here, rather than there, but they are inaccessible to us.

A second, preliminary point which needs to be made in relation to the author’s previous quote is that "states" are not "psychological and spiritual transformations that travelers undergo in their attempt to pass through the stations." This disavowal has several aspects.

Although all states are experiential in nature, these states are spiritual conditions and not psychological ones. A spiritual condition is not a function of, nor does it give expression to: biology, brain-states, anomalous synaptic processes, fluctuations in the levels of neurotransmitters or neuropeptides, cognition, and so on - although any, or all, of the latter may be correlated with, and, possibly, ensue from, an on-going spiritual condition.

In addition, a spiritual state is not a transformation. It is a transitory condition which marks a certain kind of ephemeral unveiling - such as an insight, flash of intuition, vision, or some other kind of phenomenological event which takes up temporary lodging in the consciousness of the individual.

Such states could have a modulating effect on intention, aspiration, understanding, or conduct, but the state is more like a visit from a friend which leaves its mark on us than it is like a transformation. Whatever ramifications arise as a result of this sort of visit, the visitor - that is, the state - eventually leaves ... and, usually, sooner rather than later.

Furthermore, a seeker does not necessarily traverse "states" while attempting "to pass through the stations". States are Divine gifts which, often, are quite independent of issues involving spiritual ‘stations’.

In fact, an individual might ‘travel’ from station to station without ever experiencing a mystical state. Thus, states are not way-stations which mark stages that, ultimately, culminate in one sort of spiritual station or another.

Frequently, spiritual states serve as signs which lend support to the individual in various ways. For example, they may give expression to Divine consolations that help render the difficulties of the quest somewhat easier to bear. Or, states may be God’s way of letting the individual know that spiritual progress is being made and not to despair of God’s Mercy. Or, states may be a form of Divine guidance. Or, states may be intended to help inspire the individual to struggle more persistently and rigorously.

Notwithstanding the foregoing comments, the Sufi Path is not about states. Indeed, shaykhs warn seekers about getting caught up with, longing for, wishing for, or having expectations concerning, spiritual states.

Fulfillment of fitra, or one’s primordial spiritual capacity, involves realization of, and abiding in, the Divine Presence. This is not a state, and no sequence or series of states can lead to such a realization.

In the Qur’an one finds: "There are varying grades with Allah, and Allah sees what they do." (3:163) Some shaykhs have attempted to state what some of these grades are, and some of these same shaykhs have differed, somewhat, with one another, in relation to the order of these grades and/or how such grades are to be characterized.

However, these descriptions and characterizations are not necessarily meant to be cast in stone as universals of the Path. Like explorers in the physical world, some spiritual explorers have set down conceptual maps which reflect, to varying degrees, certain aspects of their own travel experience.

Descriptions are given in a spirit of helpfulness so that others may gain a few points of reference which could help to demarcate the lay of the spiritual ‘landscape’ through which subsequent spiritual explorers might venture. Of course, not all travelers may journey through precisely the same ‘landscape’ as a predecessor has described, and, as a result, the experiences of later ‘explorers’ may be different which, in turn, could give rise to another kind of characterization of the spiritual journey.

In truth, spirituality is not a linear process. It is highly non-linear.

Experience is a function of personal history, circumstances, personality, temperament, capacity, needs, strengths, and weaknesses. All of these factors can vary from one individual to another and, consequently, there are many facets of the spiritual journey which are unique to the individual seeker.

To be sure, since we all have bodies, minds, nafs, hearts, spirits, and so on, there will be areas of similarity and overlap from one seeker to the next. Moreover, spiritual themes such as repentance, longing, gratitude, fear, dependence, and love are common to travelers of the Sufi Path.

Nonetheless, the foregoing commonalities of the journey frequently are engaged in ways which - to borrow a term from Wittgenstein - bear a ‘family resemblance’ to one another, but one still would have considerable difficulty in reducing down this ‘resemblance’ to a consistent set of universal factors. The experience which one person has while engaging, and being engaged by, various facets of the Path may be quite different from the experiences that give expression to another individual’s spiritual journey - despite the presence of any number of commonalities.

Consequently, in light of the foregoing considerations, most shaykhs probably would not devote a great deal of attention to describing spiritual stations. There are just too many exceptions, variations, and unique features to make the sort of expenditure of time, to which the author is alluding, worthwhile.

Just as importantly, no shaykh would presume to say how any spiritual journey must go. The Path is established by God, and each individual has a God-given, unique potential for traversing that Path.

In conjunction with the issue of spiritual stations, a shaykh might give suggestions, possibilities, or considerations on which to reflect or which give expression to the experiences of a certain number of travelers of the Path. Ultimately, however, God is the one who lays out the precise, unique character of the Path that is to be encountered by any given individual.

If one becomes too insistent on, or rigid with, one’s description of the sequence and nature of spiritual stations, this can create difficulties for a seeker. Instead, on the Sufi Path, one should become, as has been suggested by a number of shaykhs, like the body which is being cleaned in a ritual manner as it is readied for burial - namely, one should go in whatever direction the One cleansing the body moves one.

Sufi shaykhs, of course, do devote some time to talking about spiritual stations, but they tend to spend much more time on matters which are pertinent to what is going on here and now, as opposed to what might occur, if God wishes, somewhere down the spiritual road. Therefore, discussions involving: niyat, purification, nisbath, remembrance, adab, observance, service, and submission are of much more immediate concern to a shaykh than is talk of spiritual stations.

Unlike spiritual states, the realization of spiritual stations requires constant effort. Consequently, given that shaykhs are inclined to emphasize matters of priority and practicality, the teachings of the shaykhs constantly remind seekers about the need to struggle and leave the rest to Allah.

If the seeker is sincere and persistent in her or his struggles toward realization, God will look after the states and stations. Becoming preoccupied with future possibilities - whether in the form of states or stations, is counterproductive to the spiritual needs and requirements of the present.





| Part One | Next |





















Copyright © 2004 Interrogative Imperative Institute. All Rights Reserved.