Spiritual Health Learning Community Center
Exploring Life's Horizons
 
                                            
»   Reality Menu
The Reality Without A Name
21 - Theory - Part Two


The author of Sufism - A Short Introduction contends that: "God’s mercy and love give rise to the world, but there is an important difference between the two attributes. Mercy flows in one direction, from God to the world, but love moves in both directions. People can love God, but they cannot have mercy upon Him, only upon other creatures."

To begin with, the author’s way of stating things in the foregoing quote is not quite correct, and this is so in several respects. More specifically, the principle of tawhid encompasses, and governs, all levels of manifest Being.

While Divine ‘mercy’ and ‘love’ are prominent qualities throughout Creation, one cannot reduce tawhid down to being expressions of just ‘mercy’ and ‘love’. Tawhid gives expression to many attributes, names, and qualities, and everything is tied together by Divine Purpose.

When Divinity spoke of wanting the ‘Hidden Treasure’ to be known, no details are mentioned about the nature of such knowing except that, somehow, Creation is to have a role to play in this knowing process since that is why, according to the Hadith, created things were brought forth. Implicit in this Hadith is an unstated purpose - namely, the way in which, and the extent to which, Creation is to come to know the ‘Hidden Treasure’.

Consequently, ‘mercy’ and ‘love’ are not just being arbitrarily lavished upon Creation. Rather, the ‘mercy’ and ‘love’ are expressed in terms of, and are directed by, an over-all plan for bringing ‘Hidden Treasure’, love, knowledge, and Creation together in a certain way.

In other words, the created universe was brought into existence by a Divine niyat or intention in which ‘mercy’ and ‘love’, along with many other Divine Attributes and Names, are woven to form a rich, mysterious, subtle, complex, layered, deep, exacting, unified whole capable of bringing to realization the focus of the Original Divine niyat or intention. To single out this or that attribute as being the cause of the created universe is to distort the nature of the principle of tawhid in which all dimensions of that principle serve, and give expression to, an underlying niyat or intention - an intention whose ultimate nature remains shrouded in mystery because we have no access to the Divine Essence out of which it arose.

After stipulating that the created universe arose out of Divine ‘mercy’ and ‘love’, the author of Sufism - A Short Introduction goes on to assert: "...but there is an important difference between the two attributes. Mercy flows in one direction, from God to the world, but love moves in both directions. People can love God, but they cannot have mercy upon Him, only upon other creatures."

Since Sufi masters maintain there is nothing in existence but the Real, and since the author acknowledges, in a variety of places, that what the shaykhs agree upon in this respect is, indeed, a central precept of the Sufi Path, then, it follows that "creatures" are nothing but manifestations arising from the ‘activity’ of Divine Attributes and Names. If this is so, then, when "creatures" show mercy to other "creatures, this is, in truth, nothing but one manifestation of Divinity - referred to as a ‘creature’ - serving as a locus of transmission for the Divine quality of mercy with respect to some other locus of Divine manifestation - referred to as ‘some other creature’.

From the perspective of the Sufi shaykhs, mercy cannot flow in any manner except from the Divine to the Divine. In other words, mercy flows from one aspect of the ‘Hidden Treasure’ to another facet of the ‘Hidden Treasure’, but the pathway along which the mercy flows is via the realm of manifestation which appears as the screen or veil of Creation upon which the Divine Attributes and Names project the shadow figures of different dimensions of the fixed form known as the ‘Reality of Muhammad’ through the command of ‘Kun’.

There is a Hadith Qudsi which states: "O son of Adam, I fell ill and you visited Me not. The son of Adam will say: ‘O Lord, and how should I visit You when You are the Lord of the worlds? God will say: ‘Did you not know that My servant So-and-so had fallen ill and you visited him not? Did you not know that had you visited him you would have found Me with him? O son of Adam, I asked you for food and you fed Me not.’ The son of Adam will say: ‘O Lord, and how should I feed You when You are the Lord of the worlds?’ God will say: ‘Did you not know that My servant So-and-so asked you for food and you fed him not? Did you not know that had you fed him you would surely have found Me with him? O son of Adam, I asked you to give Me drink, and you gave Me not to drink.’ Th son of Adam will say: ‘O Lord, how should I give You to drink when You are the Lord of the worlds?’ God will say: ‘My servant So-and-so asked you to give him to drink and you gave him not to drink. Had you given him to drink, you surely would have found Me with him."

Any person who supposes the foregoing Hadith Qudsi is just a manner of speaking, and nothing more, does not understand the nature of tawhid. Had the son of Adam visited the ill servant, or given food or drink to the servant who requested these, mercy would have flowed from Divinity through the son of Adam to the servant of God and, therefore, back to Divinity who was, in each case, with the servant in need.

The principle of tawhid requires that the meaning of "with" in the foregoing Hadith is not a matter of ‘twoness’. There is only One, and manifestation is an expression of that Oneness.

Surely, the above Hadith is about extending mercy to Divinity, but the adab of this transaction is to take the quality of mercy which Divinity loans one and permit it to flow through to the intended ‘creaturely’ locus of manifestation that God is with. In the given Hadith, the creaturely destination of the mercy (in the form of visiting, food or drink) is a servant of God that Divinity is with, but, by analogy, the destination of the loaned mercy could be any of the creatures of Creation, for God is with all Creation - otherwise such creatures could not be.

What is true of mercy is also true of love. Human love arises from, and is a reflection of (in part), the love which was inherent in the Divine niyat which gave rise to Creation.

Love, whether directed toward another human being or directed toward God, flows from the Divine to the Divine. This flow occurs through one, or another, facet of created manifestation - facets or creatures or loci of manifestation which are the appearances generated through the activity of the Divine Attributes and Names in accordance with the original niyat of Divinity concerning the Hidden Treasure and Creation.





| Part One | Next |





















Copyright © 2004 Interrogative Imperative Institute. All Rights Reserved.