Spiritual Health Learning Community Center
Exploring Life's Horizons
 
                                            
»   Reality Menu
The Reality Without A Name
16 - Shahadah


Pages 7 and 8 - Chapter One: "In this brief outline of the basics of Islam, it is important to notice the primary place accorded to the dual Shahadah or ‘testimony of faith’. This is to bear witness that ‘There is no god but God’ and ‘Muhammad is His messenger.’ The Shahadah provides the key to understanding the Islamic perspective in all domains.

"In the definition of ‘submission,’ the Shahadah is listed as the first required act of Muslims. By verbally acknowledging the reality of God and the prophetic role of Muhammad, one makes the other four pillars and the Sharia incumbent upon oneself.

"The Shahadah also defines the content of faith, whose primary element is faith in God. The nature of the God in whom Muslims have faith is set down briefly by the first Shahadah, while all the objects of faith are conceptualized in terms of the concomitants of the second Shahadah, which designates the domain of the message and the messenger."

Commentary: In a sense, the Shahadah is not "the first required act of Muslims". To begin with, Shahadah is a doorway to affirming one’s already existing status as a Muslim, irrespective of whether one was born into a Muslim family or one was born into other than a Muslim family.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said: "Every child is born according to primordial nature (fitra)" but, then, our parents may bring us up in accordance with this or that tradition. Moreover, even if the family into which an individual is born may be nominally Muslim or may consider themselves Muslim, this fact, in and of itself, does not necessarily mean the parents or family of such a child will be rooted - either in terms of practice, understanding, or faith - in the Islamic tradition that is actually taught through the Qur’an or the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

The Prophet had indicated there would be 71 sects of Jews, but only one of these would be on the right path. In addition, he said there would be 72 sects of Christians, but only one of these would be on the right path. Finally, he also stated there would be 73 sects of Muslims, but only one of these would be on the right path.

To say Shahadah is not enough. This act presupposes some minimal degree of understanding concerning the nature of that in relation to which Shahadah is being said.

To say Shahadah, is to give expression to a realization of one’s need to seek discernment concerning the truth of ‘what is’, as well as, ‘where’, ‘how’, and ‘why’ we fit into this ‘what’. To say Shahadah, is the opening salvo of a life-long struggle to differentiate the one right way among the 73 possible paths (72 of which are problematic) to which the Prophet was alluding in the foregoing Hadith. The Qur’an states: "Each one does according to one’s rule of conduct, and thy Lord is best aware of the one whose way is right." (17:84)

The Qur’an describes the ‘time’ in pre-eternity in which Allah addressed the spirits and asked them: "Am I not your Lord?" According to the Qur’an, we all answered "Yes". (7:172) However, since the ‘time’ of that answer, the understanding inherent in our response has become lost within ourselves as we made the transition from the realm of pre-eternity to the realm of earthly existence.

By saying Shahadah, one gives expression to a recognition or acknowledgment - on some level - of a need to work toward realizing all that is entailed by both the Quranic question: "Am I not your Lord?" and our original answer: "Yes". In effect, the Shahadah is the gateway back to our origins for it contains, in its depths, both the question and answer of pre-eternity.

To say Shahadah, is not "the first required act of Muslims". Shahadah is the vehicle, so to speak, through which one engages the journey of discovery concerning not only what it means to be Muslim, but what being Muslim has to do with our primordial nature or ‘fitra’, and as such, Shahadah is the ship on which one sets sail.

However, before one can embark on such a voyage, one must understand - in some minimal fashion - that there is a need for both the voyage and a ship. As such, understanding, of some kind, precedes the act of Shahadah, and the latter is a way of formally acknowledging the former - otherwise Shahadah becomes just a mindless, heartless, spiritless, empty, speech act.

To say Shahadah, is to recognize the need for a mode of transportation in order to arrive at where we want to go - which is the end of the line concerning the nature of reality, together with the truth about who and why we are. This means the attestation of Shahadah is not so much the first required act of a Muslim, as much as it is an admission that one can’t get ‘there’ (i.e., back to the knowledge and understanding of our original condition in pre-eternity) from ‘here’(our current condition of spiritual ignorance and being veiled) without assistance.

In short, the sense in which the word "required" can be applied to the Shahadah is as an acknowledgment of needing some sort of means of transporting us from ignorance to knowledge, or from darkness to light, or from being veiled to being unveiled, or from potential to realization. There is no element here of an obligation being imposed on human beings and to suggest otherwise is problematic in a variety of ways.

In fact, the language of the Qur’an in this regard does not speak of ‘obligation’ but speaks, instead, in terms of ‘amana’ or ‘trust’. As the Qur’an indicates, a "Trust" was offered to the heavens and mountains and earth, but they all refused, being afraid with respect to the offer. Yet, human beings accepted this offer and have, in all too many cases, proven themselves to be fools and tyrants concerning their response to, or handling of, the Trust (33:72).

This offer was not imposed upon, or made obligatory on, human beings. An opportunity was offered, and human beings accepted.

The Qur’an does indicate that trusts should be returned to the owner or owners of such trusts (4:58) as a basic principle of etiquette, morality, justice, or adab. Indeed, irrespective of spiritual tradition, philosophical stance, or political persuasion, there does seem to be an inherent dimension within human beings concerning the basic injustice or inappropriateness of keeping something to which one does not have a fundamental right.

However, this makes acceptance of the trust a matter of fiduciary responsibility in relation to the Trust, on behalf of the Owner, and not a matter of an obligation and requirement which has been imposed independently of what human beings have agreed to accept on their own. In other words, once a human being has accepted the offer of the ‘Trust’, then, there is a ‘duty of care’ associated with this acceptance, but this ‘duty of care’ arises entirely as a matter of responsibility of that to which the individual has stipulated in accepting the offer, and not as a matter of what has been imposed on the individual by the One Who has extended the offer or Trust.

The "damages" which ensue if an individual does not fulfill the fiduciary responsibilities or duty of care associated with the ‘accepting’ of the offer of the Trust, will accrue to the one who has failed to live up to the responsibilities of acceptance. The One Who offered the Trust sustains no damages because the whole idea behind the offering of the Trust, to begin with, was in order to benefit the individual who accepted the offer.

The offer is an opportunity. It is not a requirement for anything except that once accepted, if an individual wishes to realize the possibilities inherent in the opportunity, then, there are ways which can assist one to actualize the potential of the offer or Trust.

In this context, spiritual guidance (whether through Revelation, a Prophetic mission, the teachings of any of the friends of God, or one’s own spiritual progress) is for the purpose of supporting an individual’s efforts to adhere to the requirements of the fiduciary responsibilities which the individual assumed by accepting the offer in the first place. The Qur’an stipulates there is no compulsion in matters of Deen (2:256), and the fiduciary responsibilities surrounding the offering of the Trust are all entailed by Deen since Deen is the Way through which the potential of fitra is realized.

Fitra, or primordial nature, is the opportunity. Fitra is grounded in the Trust being offered. By realizing the potential of fitra, one is returning the Trust to its Owner.

What is this Trust? It is rooted in the reason underlying Creation - that is, as is recorded in a Hadith Qudsi (in which Divinity speaks through the Prophet Muhammad - peace be upon him): "I (Divinity) was a Hidden Treasure and desired (or loved) to be known, so I (Divinity) brought forth Creation."

The Trust concerns the possibility of a specific way of knowing the ‘Hidden Treasure’. More specifically, all facets of Creation fulfill the purpose of the original desire of Divinity merely through their being and giving expression to manifest knowledge of the ‘Hidden Treasure’ by virtue of the nature inherent in different modalities of created being. But, the opportunities vested in the Trust are about coming to know something of the ‘Hidden Treasure’ with respect to what is at the heart of the innermost dimension of the original Divine Desire or Himma (Aspiration).

We struggle toward this to our own benefit, and not to the benefit of Divinity. Moreover, to the extent we neglect this opportunity which was set in motion by acceptance of the Trust, then, we will be the losers, not Divinity - in either case we shall meet with our Lord: "O mankind! Surely you are ever toiling on towards your Lord - painfully toiling, but you shall meet Him." (84:6)

The author of Sufism - A Short Introduction makes a common mistake when he refers to the first Shahadah as the "testimony of faith". Bearing witness, which is the focus of the first Shahadah, is not the same as a ‘testimony of faith’, which is the focus of the first declaration of ‘iman’.

If this were not so, then, there really would be no need for two attestations - one concerning ‘islam’ and one giving expression to ‘iman’. If this were not so, then, there would be no reason for the Prophet to be instructed, through revelation, to tell the bedouins, who had come to him proclaiming belief in God and His Messenger, to say, instead, that they submit, for belief had not, yet, entered their hearts. If this were not so, there would be no need to distinguish between ‘islam’ and ‘iman’.That which is being attested to in relation to ‘submission’ and ‘faith’, respectively, involves a different kind and level of affirmation in each instance.

The Qur’an informs us there can be no compulsion in matters of Deen. Given this Quranic principle, then, ‘the first required act of Muslims’ cannot be Shahadah if one is construing "required" to mean that which has been made obligatory upon, and is being imposed on, human beings since this would be in violation of the spirit of non-compulsion which is at the heart of the Quranic message.

All of life is a matter of choice. We choose to our benefit, and we choose to our detriment.

‘Guidance’, whether given through the Qur’an or the Sunnah (actions) of the Prophet or through the teachings of a shaykh or through one’s own inner unveiling, is not about stating what is obligatory. Guidance is preoccupied with informing us about options, possibilities, degrees of freedom, problems, and consequences in relation to the exercise of choice.

Guidance is concerned with providing help, insights, suggestions, assistance, support, advisory warnings, and so on, concerning the journey of life. What we do with such guidance is up to us, but, whatever we do, we must know that what we choose to do will either help us as individuals or hurt us as individuals.

Guidance is a manifestation of Beneficence and Compassion. It is not, nor was it ever intended to be, an onerous burden to be imposed on human beings as a litany of obligations which are required to be performed ... or ELSE!

At the same time, we neglect guidance at our own risk. However, the risk which is at issue here is not primarily a matter of the dire consequences which may ensue if heed is not given to the guidance which comes to us. Rather, the risk we run is to miss out on fulfilling the purpose of our lives, along with the concomitant realization of our own spiritual potential, and in all of this, our lives become the evidence which can be marshaled against us on the Last Day when what we have done is measured against what could have been the case had we sincerely pursued the realization of essential identity and spiritual capacity - "On the Day when their tongues, their hands, and their feet shall testify against them." (24:24)

Unfortunately, there seems to be a, ‘forced sense’ of "required" inherent in the author’s previous quote for he goes on to say the following. "By verbally acknowledging the reality of God and the prophetic role of Muhammad, one makes the other four pillars and the Sharia incumbent upon oneself".





| Shahadah - Part 2 | Menu For Reality Without A Name |





















Copyright © 2004 Interrogative Imperative Institute. All Rights Reserved.